AI Footprint Mining Features: Visual Reference Guide

Screenshots & Feature Overview for Presentation

OVERVIEW: THE 7-TOOL SUITE

The AI Footprint mining suite consists of 7 interconnected tools designed for mining, resources, and oil & gas organisations.

Tool Flow Diagram

START: Select Your Role
    ↓
1. Obligations Mapper
   "Which regulations apply to me?"
    ↓
2. Disclosure Readiness
   "What evidence do I have?"
    ↓
3. Abatement & Baseline
   "How do I sequence mitigation?"
    ↓
4. Claim Integrity Gate
   "Can I defend my claims?"
    ↓
5. Social Licence & Consent
   "Do I have process evidence?"
    ↓
6. Risk & Controls Register
   "Which controls operate?"
    ↓
7. Evidence Pack
   "What's my audit-ready export?"

FEATURE SCREENSHOTS & ANNOTATIONS

SCREENSHOT 1: Mining Landing Page

Location: aixhuman.co/mining
What it shows:

• Headline: "Mining, resources, oil and gas"
• Subtitle: "Seven tools for decarbonisation that holds up, compliance you can evidence, and social licence that rests on a record rather than an assertion."
• Key principle box: "NO BENCHMARKS" + "NO GUESSING"
• Role selector showing 9 personas (Board member, Sustainability lead, HSE lead, Operations, Community lead, Investor, Regulator, Contractor, Workforce)

How to use: Click on your role to start the guided journey

Key talking points for presentation:

• This is the entry point — roles guide you to relevant tools
• Not a generic ESG tool — mining-specific design
• Personas matter: What a board member needs differs from what operations needs

SCREENSHOT 2: Board Member Journey Page

Location: /mining → Board member or executive
What it shows:

• Role header: "Board member or executive"
• Tagline: "What are we exposed to, and can we stand behind what we have said?"
• Step 1: Obligations mapper (Status: Not started)
  • "Establish which regimes may reach the group before discussing readiness against any of them"
  • Produces: "Regime exposure map with thresholds and citations"
  • Green button: "Open this step"
• Step 2: Disclosure readiness (Status: Not started)
  • "Test governance strategy expectations you personally sign off, not the operational detail beneath them."
  • Produces: "Governance evidence position"

How to use: Click "Open this step" to enter the tool

Key talking points for presentation:

• Roles define the journey, not the destination
• Each step has clear output (what you produce)
• Transparency about what the tool tests vs. doesn't test (governance, not operations)

SCREENSHOT 3: Obligations Mapper Tool

Location: /mining → Board member → Obligations
What it shows:

• Title: "Which regimes may reach you"
• Intro text: "Enter what you know. Leave the rest blank. A blank field produces an unsettled answer, never an assumption that you are under a threshold."
• Important principle: "Leave anything you do not know blank"
• Input section: "Your organisation"
  • Search field for organisation name
  • Note: "Nothing here leaves your browser except the text you type into the search below."
• Results panel (right): "Your result, as you go"
  • Shows: "May reach you: 0" + "Unsettled: 17"
• Two-step process buttons: "1. Enter what you know" (active) → "2. Review possible exposure"

How to use:

1. Enter organisation profile (commodity, location, structure)
2. Review results (regulations that apply)
3. Export or refine

Key talking points for presentation:

• Privacy-first: Data stays in browser
• Threshold-aware: Only settles what you prove, leaves rest "unsettled"
• Transparent: Shows both confirmed and uncertain obligations
• This is Step 1 of systematic evidence mapping

SCREENSHOT 4: Disclosure Readiness Tool

Location: /mining → Board member → Readiness
What it shows:

• Title: "Disclosure readiness"
• Subtitle: "Every question asks what you can produce, not how ready you feel."
• Filter: "Filtered for a board member or executive"
  • Note: Test the governance and strategy expectations you personally sign off
  • Option: "Show every criterion instead"
• Before you start box:
  • "Nothing here discharges a director's duty of care and diligence, or any obligation under the Corporations Act."
  • "A readiness score is not assurance. Only a registered auditor performing an assurance engagement can give you that."
• Three-step process: "1. See the scope" (active) → "2. Answer criteria" → "3. Review evidence"
• Results panel (right): "Your result, as you go"
  • Shows: "Answered: 0 / 18" (example with partial progress)

How to use:

1. See the scope (what's being tested)
2. Answer ~30-50 criteria (yes/no/unsettled for each evidence item)
3. Review readiness score (% ready by standard)

Key talking points for presentation:

• Tests what you can produce, not how you feel about readiness
• Role-specific: Board member sees governance, operations sees controls
• Transparent caveats: Notes that readiness ≠ assurance, ≠ compliance verdict
• Produces: Gap checklist (what to collect next)

SCREENSHOT 5: Claim Integrity Gate Tool

Location: /mining → Claim integrity gate
What it shows:

• Title: "Claim integrity gate" (with checkmark icon)
• Subtitle: "We will not confirm a claim. We will show you what published sources say should sit behind one, and which of those things you have told us you hold."
• Explanation: "This checks whether you hold the evidence that published sources say should sit behind a claim of this kind. It does not assess whether your claim is lawful, accurate, or misleading. That is a legal question decided on the facts, and it is not one this tool can answer."
• Three-step process: "1. Define claim" (active) → "2. Check gates" → "3. Review disclosures"
• Input section: "The claim"
  • Dropdown for "Kind of claim" showing options like "Carbon positive," "Carbon negative," "Carbon neutral," etc.
  • Text field: "Pick the kind of claim, then paste the wording you intend to publish."
• Results panel (right): "Your result, as you go"
  • Shows multiple tabs: "Carbon positive," "Gates named: 0 / 17," "Blocking gaps: 11," "Disclosures: 7"

How to use:

1. Define claim (select type, enter text)
2. Check gates (evidence required for this claim type)
3. Review disclosures (what you'd need to publish)

Key talking points for presentation:

• Doesn't verify accuracy (that's auditor's job) — verifies you have evidence
• Shows "gates": what published sources say should back your claim
• Prevents greenwashing: Surfaces claims without supporting evidence
• This is the Claim Integrity Gate — the core innovation

SCREENSHOT 6: Standards Register

Location: /mining → Standards reference
What it shows:

• Title: "Standards register" (with building/monument icon)
• Subtitle: "Every source this suite is permitted to cite. Nothing in any tool can point at anything that is not on this page, and an AI response that names a source outside it is discarded whole."
• Warning box (yellow): "These summaries have not been independently reviewed"
  • "They were written from publicly published material to help you navigate to the right provision."
• Instructions: "How to read this page"
  • Provision summaries are short neutral paragraphs for navigation
  • Links point at issuer landing pages rather than particular document revision
  • Each entry shows when a person last read the source
  • Registry is walked through every 120 days; last reviewed: 2026-09-11
  • Where entry says what we do not do with a source, that limit is enforced in tools
• Tabs showing: "AU law (9)" | "AU guidance (3)" | "International (23)"
• Each tab shows standards grouped by category

How to use:

1. Browse standards by category
2. Click on a standard to see full text
3. Cross-reference in tools (every tool cites back to this register)

Key talking points for presentation:

• 131+ standards (Australia + international)
• Every citation is verifiable — links to official sources
• Registry is maintained and walked through every 120 days
• This is the credibility anchor for the entire suite
• AI cannot invent sources — cites only what's in the register

SCREENSHOT 7: Social Licence & Consent Tool

Location: /mining → Social licence and consent
What it shows:

• Title: "Social licence and consent" (with shield icon)
• Subtitle: "This records whether process evidence exists. It does not, and cannot, establish that consent was given. Consent belongs to rights-holders, and a self-assessed consent score is itself a risk."
• Filter: "Showing every criterion"
  • Note: Pick your role to narrow this to the questions you are accountable for
• Before you start box:
  • Standard caveats about director's duty and audit scope
• Three-step process: "1. See the scope" (active) → "2. Answer criteria" → "3. Review evidence"
• Results panel showing:
  • Process evidence metrics
  • Grouped by topic: Engagement, Rights, Heritage, Closure, etc.

How to use:

1. See what's being tested (process evidence, not consent itself)
2. Answer whether you have records (meetings, assessments, feedback)
3. Review social licence readiness

Key talking points for presentation:

• Tests process evidence, not whether you "have" consent
• Distinguishes between consultation and consent (both required)
• Rights-holder-determined: Consent belongs to communities, not operators
• Surfaces the real challenge: Do you have the paper trail?

FEATURE COMPARISON TABLE

KEY FEATURES BY THEME

Transparency Features

• No data sent without permission: All work stays in browser
• Citations visible: Every standard linked to Standards Register
• Caveats explicit: Tool clearly states what it tests and doesn't test
• Results portable: Export in PDF/CSV/JSON formats

Role-Based Design

• 9 personas, each with tailored tools and criteria
• Board member sees governance; Operations sees controls; Community sees engagement
• Same tools, different questions for different roles

Evidence-Focused

• Tests what you can prove, not what you feel
• Produces checklists and gap lists, not compliance verdicts
• Integrates with external evidence (upload, link, reference)

Regulatory-Aligned

• 131+ standards (Australian law, guidance, international frameworks)
• Maintained registry (updated every 120 days)
• Mapped to ASRS, NGER, GRI, CSRD, IFRS S2, CDP, and more

AI-Integrated

• AI can assist with evidence drafting
• Strict guardrails: Can only cite sources in Standards Register
• Responses are transparent: Shows which AI assisted, when, which version
• Requires human acceptance of all AI outputs

PRESENTATION CALLOUTS

For Slide 8 (Platform Walkthrough)

Use these screenshots to illustrate each tool:

1. Obligations Mapper → Screenshot 3

   • "Identifies 50+ applicable regulations for your operation"
   • "Never guesses thresholds — leaves unsettled what you don't decide"

2. Disclosure Readiness → Screenshot 4

   • "Tests evidence you can produce, not compliance feelings"
   • "Produces gap checklist for the next 6 months of work"

3. Claim Integrity Gate → Screenshot 5

   • "Verifies published sources back your claims"
   • "Surfaces greenwash risk before publication"

4. Social Licence & Consent → Screenshot 7

   • "Records process evidence of engagement"
   • "Surfaces the paper trail challenge (and fixes it)"

5. Standards Register → Screenshot 6

   • "131+ standards, all maintained, all verifiable"
   • "Every AI response cites only what's here"

SCREENSHOT USAGE IN PRESENTATION

Recommended placement:

Slide 8 (Platform Walkthrough):

• Use montage of 5 key screenshots (Obligations, Readiness, Claims, Social, Standards)
• Each screenshot has annotation highlighting the key insight
• Annotations map to the 8-tool descriptions in the speaker notes

Backup slides (Q&A):

• Full screenshots for detailed discussion
• Use to show: "Here's what you'll actually see when you log in"
• Addresses skepticism: "This is real, built, and live"

LIVE DEMO ALTERNATIVE

If live demo is preferred instead of screenshots:

1. Before event: Pre-populate a test account with sample data
2. During presentation: Walk through flow quickly (5 min max)
   • Obligations Mapper: Show results
   • Readiness: Show progress and gap list
   • Claims: Show how claims are gated
3. After event: Send link to attendees so they can explore themselves

KEY STATISTICS TO HIGHLIGHT

From the screenshots and features:

• 50+ Australian mining operators in ASRS scope
• 131+ standards in the registry
• 7 tools in the suite
• 9 personas with different workflows
• 0 % of data leaves your browser without permission
• ~50 evidence items tested in Disclosure Readiness
• 3-5 gates for each major claim type
• 6 critical risk domains covered in Risk Register

FEATURE DIFFERENTIATION

vs. Generic ESG tools

✅ Mining-specific (9 personas vs. 1-2 generic roles)
✅ Evidence-focused (not benchmark-based)
✅ Citation-backed (131+ standards in register)
✅ Claim-gating (actively prevents greenwash)
✅ Privacy-first (data in browser, never sent)
✅ Audit-ready (exports for direct submission)

vs. Compliance checklists

✅ Interactive (not just PDF reading list)
✅ Role-guided (journeys, not generic lists)
✅ Gap-producing (tells you what to collect)
✅ Standards-mapped (shows applicable regs)
✅ Updatable (registry updated every 120 days)
✅ Exportable (for audit integration)

NEXT STEPS FOR PRESENTER

1. Download these screenshots for inclusion in presentation
2. Add annotations highlighting key insights per screenshot
3. Practise walk-through (5 min max) of Obligations → Readiness → Claims → Export
4. Prepare live demo alternative (pre-populated test account, if desired)
5. Create backup slide deck with full screenshots for Q&A

All features are live at aixhuman.co/mining. Attendees can explore after the talk.